Archive for June, 2009

Michael Jackson queries initially interpreted as attack

RIP MJAlex and I are both big MJ fans, and were naturally upset by his passing last week. However, Alex and I are also both fans of Google, so it was interesting – if still slightly upsetting – to see what effect Michael’s death had online (besides the setting up of billions of decentralised “RIP Michael Jackson” Facebook groups, of course).

Taking a look at the last 30 days at Google Trends, well, some pretty clear results here:
mj

Such was the increase in search volume (from index 0 to 10 in fewer than 48 hours!), that Google actually interpreted the influx of Jacko-related searches as a malware attack or similar. In fact, by the time I had managed to get to a computer (the news was broken to me midway through a wedding reception – poor form by the DJ, if you ask me), Googling “Michael Jackson” popped up an error message, telling me that my search looked like ‘an automated request from a computer virus or spyware application’. Well excuse me, Google, for wanting more information!

This graph from news.cnet.com shows the surge in Jackson queries in an hourly format:

Interestingly, Google received a massive increase in searches coming from mobile devices – not surprising since most Americans were at work at the time the news was announced – and they also set a record for visits in a single 24-hour period: over 16.4 million unique visitors. And with Michael’s penchant for breaking records, Google’s front page story covering his death was the most popular story to date.

Even at the time of writing – about a week after his passing – 9 of the top 10 bestselling albums in Amazon.co.uk are by Michael Jackson (10 out of 10 on Amazon.com)… his death has put his body of work out there to a new audience in ways I didn’t really expect, and I can only see this as a good thing.

Apologies to anybody reading this who is still suffering from Michael Jackson over-saturation – we just happened to think this was worth blogging. But what celebrity death won’t the media turn into a feeding frenzy these days? RIP Michael!

Comments

The Guardian’s Crowdsourcing Experiment

guardian-logo


The Nieman Group at Harvard have done a great write up of The Guardian’s “crowdsourcing” experiment. The newspaper asked their readership to go through MP’s expenses claims and flag anything that looked suspicious, with great results. As of today, for example, we have learned that the average Lib Dem MP claim for gardening expenses is more than double the typical Conservative claim. But this figure may not include moat maintenance claims. The figures are also changing as more data is processed.

Read the article here:

http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment/

If you want to do your bit for the cause, check out the link here:

http://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/

Comments

What’s this? Bing results in Google?

bing_calvin_klein

Comments

Facebook offering vanity usernames from 13th June

Source: blog.facebook.com

facebook-logoFacebook have decided – some would say at long last – to offer personalised usernames on a first-come-first-served basis from 12:01am EDT (4:01am GMT), linked to the user’s profile via a vanity URL such as http://www.facebook.com/dave.upstream. The only limitations are that only one username is allowed per profile/page, it must be at least 5 characters, and it must be made up only of alphanumeric characters and, if you want, a full stop. Thank the Lord that they’re not allowing counter-productive usernames that proliferate sites when they allow ASCII usernames such as ´¯`°¤.¸.¤…Bøñd. Jåmê§ Bøñd´¯`°¤.¸.¤ , or (L)pÛÑk~PrïÑcê§§(L)

So what does this mean? Well, for a start it’s going to be easier to link people to your Facebook profile, so you won’t need to give out your full name in order for people you just met to add you as a friend. Most people find my surname impossible to spell (even though it’s only 6 letters), so this would be useful to me if I weren’t so picky about who I add as my friends in the first place. It also not only gives companies a great opportunity for branding on Facebook, but finally gives ‘normal’ users a chance to match their Facebook username with the handle they use on other social media and bookmarking sites. This may not seem like a big thing, but username consistency will also make it easier for people to find you (that is, if you want to be found).

In SEO terms, however – which is the interesting part for us – it may well mean that you can pick pretty specific keywords for your profile to show up in Google search, which has even further-reaching possibilities. As so eloquently put by Jeremiah from web-strategist.com: “If the Blog is the new résumé, then is “Google Me” the business card?”. Businesses may be able to make strategic use of this by registering their primary keywords as the vanity username for their page, and with the power of Facebook’s pagerank this could end up being a very useful – if a little morally grey – exploit. All of this, of course, depends on whether Google will index the new Facebook URLs; but with sites like Flickr, FriendFeed, Twitter and LinkedIn featuring prominently in search results for a while now, it’s fair to say that this has become the norm for social networking sites.

Happily, Facebook have issued the following caveat to prevent the all-too predictable abuse of the new system:

Think carefully about the username you choose. Once it’s been selected, you won’t be able to change or transfer it. If you signed up for a Facebook Page after May 31 or a user profile after today at 3 p.m. EDT, you may not be able to sign up for a username immediately because of steps we’ve taken to prevent abuse or “squatting” on names.

Still, how much are you willing to bet that Facebook will be down within a few minutes of the floodgates opening for username registration…? If I could have gotten www.facebook.com/dave, I probably would have been willing to stay up until 4am on Friday night to try to nab it, just for the bragging rights. Damn their arbitrary 5 character limit…

Comments

Formans Fish Island

fish_island
Longstanding Upstream client H Forman and Sons – top in Google for Smoked Salmon – has recently moved to amazing new premises in London’s East End.

The striking, salmon pink building doubles as a unique, 600 capacity venue for parties, conferences and much more. It is also the closest venue to the rapidly developing London 2012 Olympic stadium (you can check out progress with the new stadium with Forman’s Fish Eye View webcam).

Among the delights on offer are an on-site restaurant with food from former Tate Modern chef Lloyd Hardwick. As Forman’ s is the UK’s leading salmon smoker, you can expect excellent fish on the menu!

After successfully working together for a number of years on formanandfield.com, Upstream Connections was the natural choice to create a visually striking website for the new venue. The results can be found at www.formansfishisland.com.

If you are interested in the venue, call 0208 5252390. If you would like a striking, new website, ask Upstream.

Comments